The Zero Point Field gets some coverage in The Perfect Discourse, here Hermes discusses The Void.
I consider that there is no void, there never could have been a void and there never will be a void. All parts of the cosmos are totally full, so that the cosmos itself is full and complete with bodies that differ in both form and quality; and each has its own appearance and size. One may be larger than another and one smaller; one may be more dense and another more subtle. Those that are more dense are more easily seen, as are those which are larger. Those that are smaller or subtler can only be seen with difficulty and sometimes not at all. These we know of only by keen attention.
Reading G.R.S. Mead’s Hymns of Hermes ‘Ecstatic Songs of Gnosis’, he asks the question of who is actually capable of singing God’s praises when it requires the whole universe and the countless universes of all that is, to sign the praises of God in any truly adequate manner?
Who, then, what man, has the understanding wherewith to praise God fitly, when through in his separated consciousness he knows not who he is, he yet begins to realise that “who he really is” must inevitably be God and no other?
In what manner can the Divine sing praises of itself as of some other than itself, when ‘I’ and ‘Thou’ must essentially be one, and the utterance of praise as of some other one seems to be a departure from the blessed state of that Divine intuition.
Give that some thought.
It is self-conscious and from Mind proceeds the Soul of the World.
The One participates in all; souls, separate in space and time, being present to one another in the Soul of the Whole.
The Soul of the World is not in time, but, just as light passes by gradations into darkness, so does the Ineffable pass, without loss, through gradations of being; and, even as privation of light is darkness, so is the privation of God evil; though even in evil there is a rational order which issues in good.
Parts from Wiliam Boulting’s GIORDANO BRUNO ‘His Life, Thought, and Martyrdom’ Volume 1
Reminiscence is a natural consequence of the past. The Nous has had no beginnning, the present life is therefore a new situation for the spirit, it has experienced higher realms and conceives for the world of intelligibles.
Ecstacy is the consummation of reminiscence, it is not a faculty, it is a state. This state is not permanent until union with the One is complete, here on earth ecstasy is only attained in flashes.
Such flashes are a brief respite, Man can cease to become man and become God, but man cannot be God and man at the same time.
Forgive me Jules Simon
Jacob Slavenburg in The Hermetic Link tells us a very interesting story of how Pythagoras was granted the ability to remember his past lives by Hermes Trismegistus.
He recalled his earlier lives and said he first had been Euphorus, secondly Aethalides, thirdly Hermotimus, fourth Pyrrhus and now he was Pythagoras.
Porphyrius, The Life of Pythagoras
He tells us how this extraordinary story was confirmed by Diogenes Laertius, who writes that, according to rumor, Pythagoras seems to have said of himself that he had lived earlier as Aethalides, among others.
And who was this Aethalides? A son of Hermes.
Aethalides had been given permission by his father to wish for anything he desired, except immortality. He chose eternal recollection of everything that happened in this life, as well as the life beyond the grave and on into new incarnations.
This gave him precise memories of all previous lifetimes, and this included the life of Pythagoras, the reincarnated Aethalides, as well.